Filters by definition should be a
good thing. They are meant to keep out impurities by most standards which is
why some people question my reasoning for not hiring an objective editor to
give my book a read. What people often fail to recall is that filters can also
be used to recover solids. Think of a river back in the 1800’s and take into
account that people used filters to sift out something that is far from an
impurity.
Am I comparing ideas to gold?
Well not all of them. Some are right up there on the poop stack. Then again,
due to the nature of most of my dayjobs, I’ve been subject to countless bouts
of revisions and recommendations. This means that for the most part, what has
ended up going out with my name on it is not what I did or what I believed in,
even if in the end I was held accountable for the impact said materials had.
Does that sound like a poor deal? Well that’s because it is. It is a very
shoddy, unfair deal and millions of people go through that every day.
That’s why I insisted on as
unabridged version of
Only Human as possible. I made the decisions of what goes
and what does not go and was honest enough with myself to take tough decisions
and eliminate entire pages at a time. Was it easy OR pleasant? For heaven’s
sake no. It was brutal because I had to recognize that not all of what I wrote
worked. But it helped me infinitely. It was a self imposed trial by fire and I
think it’s helped me become a better writer for it.
I’ve actually helped edit two
books, have proofread thousands of pages and have edited countless
communications (from letters to full site maps). As an editor, I clarify what
the writer is expecting from our collaboration and stick to the rules agreed
upon… and above all else, I focus on two things: that the content flows and on format. What they want to say is their decision and if they want suggestions,
I’m all for giving them the suggestions but as a writer, I know what I wouldn’t
want done to my work.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure
there are editors out there that probably could have made my book a whole lot
better. I have no doubt in that… then again, I have no doubt in my own vision
of what I want to achieve in a story arc and the places I want to go and some
people might have issues with what I think is a worthwhile place to visit.
Having read my book a few times, I’m quite clear that a lot of people might
think it’s too long, or visits too many places or whatever… the reality is that
the response from people up to now has been quite positive and I’ve been able to see a very
interesting thing happen… different people like different things. Imagine that.
So what some people saw as a
highlight, was cumbersome to others while other people gravitated to a specific
chapter and another person loved the little hidden Easter eggs and tributes to
some of my favorite musical artists, movies and writers. That also means that
for the time being, the blog, the tweets and the books that come forth with my
name on it are completely unabridged and the only filter set in place is me. So
if I don’t like it, it won’t have my name on it.
Some people measure success by
webhits, profits, or books sold… for those who hold a sense of satisfaction as
the greatest tribute to success… I salute you.
Peace, love and maki rolls.
JD.